Regulations
The regimes operators answer to, with the source behind every statement.
What the UK, US, Canadian and Australian regimes ask of a well-integrity programme, summarised from the public documents cited beside each statement. The operator determines which regime applies to each well, and BarrierLedger keeps the record behind it.
Regime
United Kingdom
UK offshore wells sit on the UK Continental Shelf, licensed and stewarded by the NSTA. The regulator publishes the licence, field and production data behind UKCS activity, and holds well and field records in its National Data Repository.
North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA), with OPRED as the offshore environmental regulator
What the regime sets out
UKCS licence, field and production data is published by the North Sea Transition Authority.
Source North Sea Transition Authority — Data and insights (opens in a new tab)
Well and field records for UKCS wells are held in the NSTA National Data Repository.
Source North Sea Transition Authority — National Data Repository (opens in a new tab)
Public documents for United Kingdom
Data and insights (opens in a new tab)
North Sea Transition Authority
Licence, field and production data for the UK Continental Shelf.
National Data Repository (opens in a new tab)
North Sea Transition Authority
Well and field records for UKCS wells.
Regime
United States
Offshore operators on the US Outer Continental Shelf are regulated by BSEE under 30 CFR Part 250. Casing-pressure management is explicit and structural.
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), US Outer Continental Shelf
What the regime sets out
30 CFR Part 250, Subpart E — Casing Pressure Management — sets out casing-pressure monitoring, diagnostic testing, record retention and corrective-action requirements for OCS wells.
Source US Government Publishing Office / National Archives — 30 CFR Part 250 — Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (opens in a new tab)
BSEE Notice to Lessees NTL 2009-G01 set out the evaluation and management expectations for wells with casing pressure; BSEE lists the notice as rescinded, and the Subpart E regulations carry the current text.
Source BSEE — NTL 2009-G01 — Casing Pressure (opens in a new tab)
Public documents for United States
30 CFR Part 250 — Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (opens in a new tab)
US Government Publishing Office / National Archives
Current OCS regulations, including the casing-pressure provisions in Subpart E.
CFR 2019 title 30 volume 2 — Part 250 (opens in a new tab)
US Government Publishing Office
The 2019 edition of Part 250, including Subpart E, in XML.
NTL 2009-G01 — Casing Pressure (opens in a new tab)
BSEE
Listed by BSEE as rescinded; kept for historical context.
Regime
Canada
Canadian wells are regulated provincially. Most portfolios are land wells, with the wellhead plus tubing/casing annulus as the common archetype.
Provincial: Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) and the BC Energy Regulator (BCER)
What the regime sets out
The Alberta Energy Regulator publishes its compliance orders.
Source Alberta Energy Regulator — Compliance orders (opens in a new tab)
The Alberta Energy Regulator publishes its closed investigations.
Source Alberta Energy Regulator — Closed investigations (opens in a new tab)
British Columbia publishes a well surface-hole status dataset through the BC Data Catalogue.
Source Province of British Columbia — Well surface hole status (opens in a new tab)
Public documents for Canada
Compliance orders (opens in a new tab)
Alberta Energy Regulator
The AER’s published compliance-order index.
Closed investigations (opens in a new tab)
Alberta Energy Regulator
The AER’s published closed-investigation index.
Well surface hole status (opens in a new tab)
Province of British Columbia
BC well surface-hole status, published through the BC Data Catalogue.
BC Energy Regulator (opens in a new tab)
BC Energy Regulator
The provincial regulator for British Columbia.
Regime
Australia
Australian regulation splits between the Commonwealth offshore regime and the state onshore regimes.
NOPSEMA (offshore safety and well integrity, Commonwealth); NOPTA is the Titles Administrator; onshore wells sit under state regimes
What the regime sets out
Offshore Commonwealth well activities sit under NOPSEMA as the safety and well-integrity regulator, with NOPTA as the Titles Administrator.
Source NOPSEMA — National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (opens in a new tab)
NOPTA publishes its position on the public release of offshore petroleum data.
Source National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator (NOPTA) — Public release of data (opens in a new tab)
Queensland onshore petroleum is administered under the Queensland Government’s petroleum and energy framework.
Source Queensland Government — Petroleum and energy — Queensland (opens in a new tab)
Onshore petroleum and well management in Western Australia is administered by the Department of Energy, Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DEMIRS).
Source Government of Western Australia — Department of Energy, Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (opens in a new tab)
Public documents for Australia
National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (opens in a new tab)
NOPSEMA
The Commonwealth offshore safety and well-integrity regulator.
Public release of data (opens in a new tab)
National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator (NOPTA)
NOPTA’s published position on the release of offshore petroleum data.
Petroleum and energy — Queensland (opens in a new tab)
Queensland Government
Queensland’s onshore petroleum framework.
Department of Energy, Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (opens in a new tab)
Government of Western Australia
Western Australia’s onshore petroleum and well-management regulator.
Where the platform fits
What BarrierLedger does with all of this.
Four things the platform gives an operator who has to answer to a regime.
The limit is yours, with its source
Each monitored annulus carries the MAWOP/MAP value you supply as master data, with the source document, its date and the reference. The platform compares readings against your value and records which value governed.
The reasoning is recorded, not asserted
Every assessment keeps its inputs hash, source-file hashes, the method-profile version and the engine build, so a status can be shown rather than remembered.
Exceptions are first-class
A well that cannot be bled to zero, a missing or stale reading, an overdue test and an out-of-family annulus each raise a named exception with its flag and whether it blocks the review.
The record an inspector asks for already exists
Locked monthly reviews, WIT evidence packs, the actions register and the incident log mean the history behind a well’s status is already assembled when an audit or inspection asks for it.
About this page
- Every statement above is drawn from the public document named beside it; nothing on this page is legal or regulatory advice or a compliance determination.
- BarrierLedger is not approved, certified or endorsed by any regulator named here. Its outputs are in-house integrity reports; regulatory submissions and official well records remain the operator’s responsibility.
Let's talk
Tell us which regime you answer to.
Bring the policy your limits come from and the reports you already produce. We will show you how the platform keeps the record behind them.